Ana içeriğe atla

Transatlantic relations at a crossroads


NATO foreign ministers hold a meeting at the alliance's headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, Dec. 4, 2018.
The alliance between the U.S. and Europe is still of great importance for global security and stability and the two sides of the Atlantic face many common challenges. But while the post-Cold War order is undergoing fundamental changes, so are transatlantic relations


Transatlantic ties between the United States and Europe have been strained recently. At the moment, it is not easy to hold on to the presumption that the ties are unshakable. Common security interests crowned by the establishment of NATO in addition to shared values and history have led to lasting partnerships; however, nowadays discussions are mainly about the future of the relationships and their relevance.
The alliance between the U.S. and Europe is still of great importance for global security and stability and the two sides of the Atlantic face many common challenges. But while the post-Cold War order is undergoing fundamental changes, so are transatlantic relations.
Since the end of World War II, the security of Europe has been the first priority for the U.S. Those were the times when the European order was the defining element of the world order. Their alliance against the common threats originating from the Soviet Union shaped their relations. But today, American citizens cannot understand why the security of Europe is so dependent on the U.S. and why their tax money goes to Europe.
On the American side, the presidency of Donald Trump and his "America First" agenda can be listed as the major reason for the dramatic change in transatlantic relations. However, Trump is not the first American president to question the nature of their relationship and the financial burden of NATO on the U.S., especially when there are many rich European countries. But Trump is the first one to challenge it so openly. The shift to unilateralism in American foreign policy is not something new either. It started before Trump's presidency and will probably continue after his term, but all this adds to Europeans' growing sense of insecurity.
On the European side, the EU is less stable than it was before. First of all, Brexit challenged the idea that the EU was inevitable. It opened a new era of uncertainty in the bloc, questioning the future of the union. It is the first time that a country wants to disintegrate from such a prestigious and exemplary union. Second, Russia's return to the game as a major power challenges the ideals of the EU project, which is based on the concept that the future belongs to civilian power. Russia reminds us of the cold facade of realism, that hard power matters. Third, the rise of China as an economic power threatens European and American interests, but they are unable to agree on how to deal with it. Finally, the rise of populist leaders and far-right parties shows us that there is a crack in the European dream.
Transatlantic relations are undergoing a fundamental redefinition. The U.S. is shifting its orientation away from Europe. It is only selectively engaged in European affairs. The U.S. has embarked on a new era of restraint where the abandonment of alliances including NATO has been pronounced. The EU, on the other hand, has lost its point of reference in the absence of the U.S., which was always on its side. It tries to establish a more balanced relationship with the U.S. but lacks the strategic culture to formulate an adequate response to the challenges it faces.
The two sides need to reestablish their relations based on shared interests and values, and rebuild trust. But for that to be successful, the U.S. must recognize that it is more powerful working with allies. The EU knows that it is important to retain its good and close relations with the U.S., and it also knows that it must put something on the table as well. However, with the turmoil inside the EU, it is not sure if it can get the political support and the financial resources to invest with.

Yorumlar

Bu blogdaki popüler yayınlar

New York’tan Ramallah’a

Erdoğan, Biden’ın görüşeceği birkaç liderden biri olacağına inanıyordu. Söylemdeki bu radikal değişim, hem Biden’a yönelik hayal kırıklığının dışa vurumu, hem de Kırım açıklamasıyla kızdırdığı Moskova’ya yönelik bir gönül alma adımıydı. Biden ile görüşmek isteyip olumsuz yanıt alanlardan biri de Filistin Yönetimi Lideri Mahmud Abbas oldu. New York, İsrail-Filistin sorunu konusunda bir toplantıya tanıklık edemedi ama, tarihi bir buluşma bu hafta Ramallah’ta gerçekleşti. Birleşmiş Milletler Genel Kurulu toplantılarına katılmak üzere New York’a giden Cumhurbaşkanı  Recep Tayyip Erdoğan , “ABD ile Türkiye'nin ortak çıkarlara dayanan iki dost ve müttefik ülke” olduğunu söyleyerek başladığı ziyaretini, “İki NATO ülkesi olarak şu andaki gidiş pek hayra alamet değil. Amerika ile olan münasebetlerimde geldiğimiz nokta maalesef iyi bir nokta değil” diyerek tamamladı. Birkaç gün içindeki bu söylem değişikliğinin sebebi, yüksek beklentilere rağmen ABD Başkanı  Biden  ile bir görüşmenin olmamas

İsrail-Arap ilişkileri gelişirken, Türkiye ile normalleşme bir türlü kurulamıyor

Bir sene önce imzalanan İbrahim Anlaşması ( Abraham Accords ) meyvelerini vermeye devam ediyor. İsrail’in imzacı ülkelerle ilişkileri -Trump’ın eksikliğine, Biden’ın ilgisizliğine rağmen- gelişmeye devam ediyor. İsrail Dışişleri Bakanı Yair Lapid yaz aylarını Körfez ülkelerini ziyaret ederek geçirdi. Temmuz ayında Birleşik Arap Emirliklerini ziyaret eden ilk İsrailli bakan olan Lapid, ziyareti sırasında Abu Dabi’de İsrail büyükelçiliğini, Dubai’de konsolosluğu açtı. İsrail ayrıca geçtiğimiz günlerde Dubai’de gerçekleşen Expo 2020’ye de katıldı. İlk kez İsrail pavyonu bir Arap ülkesinde yer aldı. Ağustos ayına geldiğimizde ise Lapid Fas’taydı. İki ülke arasındaki bu ilk üst düzey görüşme, işbirliği olanaklarının artırılmasını da beraberinde getirdi. Sonbahar ise İsrail için ilklerin yaşandığı bir dönem olmaya devam ediyor. İlk önce Bahreyn İsrail’e ilk büyükelçisini atadı. Ardından eylül ayı sonunda Lapid, Bahreyn’in başkenti Manama’yı ziyaret etti. Bu ziyaret bir İsrailli bakanın ülkey

Turkey has flipped the script on its regional isolation. But will it amount to real change?

Turkey has been working away at recalibrating its foreign policy by tracking down new allies and issuing conciliatory statements—and it’s a crucial part of the country’s bid to become a regional leader, energy hub, and economic powerhouse. But are Ankara’s steps toward recalibration big enough to really change the regional landscape? Last month, Turkish Deputy Foreign Minister Sedat Önal hosted his Egyptian counterpart in  Ankara for rapprochement talks focusing on regional issues. The latest talks follow a first-round visit to  Cairo  in May, where Turkey and Egypt hashed out bilateral concerns. It’s a remarkable moment, since these visits marked the first high-level political consultations between the two powers since the 2013 military coup in Egypt, an event that led to a rapid deterioration in Cairo’s relationship with Ankara. But the recalibration isn’t just with Egypt. For several months now, Ankara has taken steps to normalize regional relationships that had been fraught with pr