Ana içeriğe atla

Populism, a temporary wind or a deep-rooted change?

After Brexit in the United Kingdom and Donald Trump's victory in the U.S., the world has been anxiously awaiting European elections where populist names have been resurgent. In many European countries, populist leaders and their political parties/movements are definitely on the rise. We can see this trend in many European countries including France. For the first time in its history, France is going into the second round of the presidential elections without any of its traditional political parties.


Their opponents see populist leaders as demagogues using public discontent for their own benefit. Populism pushes at the edges, for sure. Its main aim is to disturb the established political order. It ignores the political realities and also political compromise to achieve a solution. Its target is to challenge the status quo, upstaging traditional mainstream parties.

Populists are seen as new and brave voices against the traditional ruling elites who are perceived as indifferent to the problems the ordinary people face. Their supporters believe that the system is not working properly, and fails to deliver its promises. There is a serious distrust in political institutions. They think that traditional parties and politicians don't represent them and more importantly don't care about them. It has to be noted that we are witnessing an increase in divisive behavior, polarization in the society, human rights violations and unfair access to education, employment and other economic and social resources that create this feeling.

Economic stagnation and terrorism helped populists make their case. They perceive migration as the main culprit. They clearly otherize refugees, minorities and new comers who are mainly Muslims.

The main issue with populism is that it considers people as homogeneous. It assumes that people think the same and act the same way. It strongly advocates the idea of popular sovereignty above the sovereignty of democratic institutions. As a consequence, the world becomes black and white for them. They don't accept any other opinion but their own due to the fact that they are the majority. Therefore, the minorities are pushed out and marginalized.

For many, the rise of populist leaders is the unavoidable result of capitalism, which generated economic problems rather than remedy them, and also inequality instead of serving the interests of the people. Can we explain the rise of populism with economy? If it is so, we can conclude that fixing the economy will end the rise of this phenomenon. However, even though a good economy would for sure help solve some problems, there will still be groups unhappy with multiculturalism. The problem is not just the economy but at the same time multicultural society and Western identity, culture and values that are perceived to be endangered by newcomers. The xenophobia and Islamophobia are nurtured from this fear.

People fear the change. The change in the demography is not the only one. The technological changes that affect employment opportunities, the globalization, growing inequality, and terrorism that arrived in city centers affecting daily life generate anxiety and fear. There is always a tension between progress and stability. However, progress without any change is not possible and change creates winners but also losers. For the winners, it is easy to ignore the fact that progress can have negative consequences as well. In that respect, people voting for populist leaders want change only if it is for their own advantage. They are trying to avoid the cultural, social and economic changes that may cause fear and discomfort them.

It can be added that so far populism has never been taken so seriously. Some thought of it as a wind that will come and then blow over. However, its reasons and consequences should be debated in order to reach some real answers. It is not a short term abnormality but the result of a deep distrust against the tradition of politics, the role of the institutions and the functioning of the politics that favors some, ignoring the needs and expectations of the masses.

Yorumlar

Bu blogdaki popüler yayınlar

Ke vamos a mirar en la karantina?

Kon el fin del verano i el retorno de la karantina, estamos mas tiempo en las kazas. Les kero propozar tres serias de TV echos en Israel. El primer es "Tehran". Es una seria de espionaje muy enteresante. Una espion del Mossad viaja en sekreto a la kapital de Iran. Tehran es su lugar de nasimiento tambien. La hacker de komputadora tiene el objektivo de dezaktivar el reaktor nuklear. Esta misyon tendra implikasyones para el Medio Oriente i el mundo entero. La seria es en ebreo i perso. Es una sezon i tiene ocho episodios, kada uno 50 minutos. Mi segunda propozisyon es una seria romantika i komika. Lehiyot Ita (Estar Kon Eya) es una seria de 2013, ma muy simpatika. Izieron tambien la version Amerikana ke se yama “La beyeza i el panadero”. La seria konta la istorya de amor entre una supermodela internasyonal muy famoza i muy rika, i un simple panadero ke no tuvo la shans de ir a la eskola artistika por razones finansiales. La seria es dos sezones, 18 episodios en total i kada uno...

The Concept of Middle Power and Türkiye’s Foreign Policy

Ongoing conflicts and crises across various regions continue to underscore the intensifying power rivalries that define today’s international relations. The erosion of the post-1945 international order—and the weakening of the institutions that underpin it—has been further accelerated by the United States’ growing reluctance to maintain its traditional leadership role. As a result, uncertainty has become a defining feature of the current global landscape, marking a turbulent and complex period of transition.  Amid this shifting order, middle powers have begun to occupy a broader space in global affairs. These states, often positioned between global hegemons and smaller, less influential nations, act as stabilizers within the international system. Through mediation efforts, regional diplomacy, and strategic initiatives—sometimes beyond their material capabilities—they contribute meaningfully to international stability and governance. In times of heightened uncertainty, such states o...

Savaşin yarattiği yeni yildiz: El Cezire televizyonu

Tüm dünya evinde rahat koltuğunda oturarak naklen savaşı takip etmeyi ilk kez 1991 yılında CNN`in Körfez Savaşı yayınlarını izleyerek başladı. Devam etmekte olan Irak savaşı için seçilen kanal ise Usame bin Ladin röportajları, tutuklu askerleri ve rehineleri göstermesi gibi eleştirilen yayınları ile Arap kanalı El Cezire oldu Hakkında en çok haber yapılan haber kanalı El Cezire’nin doğuşu Arap dünyasında olağan olmayan bir olayla, Katar emirinin 1995 Kasımında İsviçre’de tatilde olduğu sırada, oğlu tarafından tahttan indirilmesi ile başlar. 1950 başkent Doha doğumlu yeni Emir Şeyh Hamad Bin Khalifa Al Thani, İngiltere’de Royal Military Academy Sandhurst’te eğitim görmüş liberal ve yenilikçi yeni bir kuşağı temsil eder. Kansız bir darbe ile dünyanın en zengin 11. ülkesinin yönetimini devralan Emir Hamad, emirliğin hazinesini Katar’ın modernleştirilmesi için kullanmaya başlar, yeni bir anayasa hazırlatır, kadına seçme ve seçilme hakkı verir. Emir Hamad ‘ın en dikkat çekici kararı ise...