Ana içeriğe atla

Populism, a temporary wind or a deep-rooted change?

After Brexit in the United Kingdom and Donald Trump's victory in the U.S., the world has been anxiously awaiting European elections where populist names have been resurgent. In many European countries, populist leaders and their political parties/movements are definitely on the rise. We can see this trend in many European countries including France. For the first time in its history, France is going into the second round of the presidential elections without any of its traditional political parties.


Their opponents see populist leaders as demagogues using public discontent for their own benefit. Populism pushes at the edges, for sure. Its main aim is to disturb the established political order. It ignores the political realities and also political compromise to achieve a solution. Its target is to challenge the status quo, upstaging traditional mainstream parties.

Populists are seen as new and brave voices against the traditional ruling elites who are perceived as indifferent to the problems the ordinary people face. Their supporters believe that the system is not working properly, and fails to deliver its promises. There is a serious distrust in political institutions. They think that traditional parties and politicians don't represent them and more importantly don't care about them. It has to be noted that we are witnessing an increase in divisive behavior, polarization in the society, human rights violations and unfair access to education, employment and other economic and social resources that create this feeling.

Economic stagnation and terrorism helped populists make their case. They perceive migration as the main culprit. They clearly otherize refugees, minorities and new comers who are mainly Muslims.

The main issue with populism is that it considers people as homogeneous. It assumes that people think the same and act the same way. It strongly advocates the idea of popular sovereignty above the sovereignty of democratic institutions. As a consequence, the world becomes black and white for them. They don't accept any other opinion but their own due to the fact that they are the majority. Therefore, the minorities are pushed out and marginalized.

For many, the rise of populist leaders is the unavoidable result of capitalism, which generated economic problems rather than remedy them, and also inequality instead of serving the interests of the people. Can we explain the rise of populism with economy? If it is so, we can conclude that fixing the economy will end the rise of this phenomenon. However, even though a good economy would for sure help solve some problems, there will still be groups unhappy with multiculturalism. The problem is not just the economy but at the same time multicultural society and Western identity, culture and values that are perceived to be endangered by newcomers. The xenophobia and Islamophobia are nurtured from this fear.

People fear the change. The change in the demography is not the only one. The technological changes that affect employment opportunities, the globalization, growing inequality, and terrorism that arrived in city centers affecting daily life generate anxiety and fear. There is always a tension between progress and stability. However, progress without any change is not possible and change creates winners but also losers. For the winners, it is easy to ignore the fact that progress can have negative consequences as well. In that respect, people voting for populist leaders want change only if it is for their own advantage. They are trying to avoid the cultural, social and economic changes that may cause fear and discomfort them.

It can be added that so far populism has never been taken so seriously. Some thought of it as a wind that will come and then blow over. However, its reasons and consequences should be debated in order to reach some real answers. It is not a short term abnormality but the result of a deep distrust against the tradition of politics, the role of the institutions and the functioning of the politics that favors some, ignoring the needs and expectations of the masses.

Yorumlar

Bu blogdaki popüler yayınlar

Disclaimer: The Power of Narratives

  Apple Mini-series, 2024 Based on Renée Knight’s bestselling 2015 novel of the same name, Disclaimer is a 2024 psychological thriller drama released on Apple TV+. Written and directed by five-time Academy Award winner Alfonso Cuarón, the seven-episode mini-series explores the power of truth, narrative, and perspective, as well as the danger of untold secrets. Disclaimer features an acclaimed cast including Cate Blanchett as Catherine Ravenscroft, Sacha Baron Cohen as her husband Robert, Kodi Smit-McPhee as her son Nicholas, Kevin Kline as Stephen Brigstocke, and Lesley Manville as his wife Nancy. The series follows Catherine, a celebrated investigative journalist whose seemingly stable life is disrupted by the arrival of a novel that appears to reveal a deeply personal secret. As the story unfolds through multiple perspectives, it explores themes of memory, identity, perception, and the often-fragile relationship between truth and narrative. Throughout the series, we witness ea...

Panorama Asks: The NATO Summit in Ankara

On 7-8 July 2026, NATO’s heads of state and government met in Ankara for the Alliance’s 36th summit. It was the second time Türkiye has hosted this gathering since Istanbul in 2004. The summit came at a difficult moment for the Alliance: a fifth year of war in Ukraine, growing pressure on European allies to turn defense-spending pledges into real industrial capacity, and continuing uncertainty over Washington’s long-term commitment to European security. The Ankara Summit Declaration reaffirmed the Alliance’s commitment to collective defense under Article 5, noted that in 2025, European allies and Canada have increased core defense investment by more than $139 billion, and announced more than $50 billion in new procurements and committed to working with industry to accelerate innovation. Support for Ukraine and the broader question of Europe’s long-term security architecture also featured prominently on the agenda. For most allies, Ankara was simply this year’s venue — one stop in a ro...

Crisis Everywhere, Security Somewhere

The year 2025 unfolded under the persistent language of “crisis.” It was defined by a landscape of wars that increasingly appeared without clear political ends. As conflicts persisted without resolution, borders hardened, political polarization deepened, and societies across regions experienced a permanent state of emergency. In this environment, crisis was no longer a temporary disruption but a regular feature of the global discourse.  Last year, we saw a world saturated with the language of security. Media reflected and reinforced this condition, flooding public discourse with references to threat, danger, and survival. However, beneath the apparent universality of this state of insecurity lay a fundamental question: security for whom? Not all forms of insecurity were narrated equally, nor were all subjects of insecurity granted the same political weight or even the same weight or visibility.  While the media coverage overwhelmingly privileged state-centric and securitized f...