Ana içeriğe atla

Will Turkey ever become an EU member?

The EU-Turkey leaders’ meeting will take place on March 26 in Varna, Bulgaria. While the EU accession process for Turkey is going nowhere, it can be said that the EU is trying to change the paradigm, stressing stronger cooperation in specific areas such as trade, defense including counter-terrorism and migration issue, instead of full membership. On the other hand, Ömer Çelik, Turkey’s minister for EU affairs already declared that Turkey would reject any deal for a closer partnership that did not involve becoming a full member. But how did we get there, and what the future holds?
The Past
2017 marked the 60th anniversary of the Treaties of Rome. Head of member states and presidents of EU institutions came together in Rome in March 2017, where the founding six European members had signed the Treaty of Rome in 1957, to celebrate and sign a joint vision for the future of the EU.
Turkey’s path to EU membership started two years later, in 1959, when she first applied to join the European Economic Community (EEC). Since then Turkey signed the Ankara Treaty in 1963 with EEC, submitted a formal request for full membership in 1987, joined the customs union with the EU in 1996, became an EU candidate in 1999, and in 2005 accession negotiations started. Today, the momentum in Turkey’s accession process is lost. Turkey has been waiting for its accession to the EU for decades now.
The Present
For Turkey, EU accession is bigger than just a foreign policy issue as it is a key political goal that has the power to create a change in various areas of policy. As described in TÜSİAD’s declaration for Europe Day 2017, the accession process became the driving force behind Turkey's transformation through reform. It also served positively in Turkey's relations with other regions. Turkey has become economically appealing and a reference for democracy for emerging countries. The EU accession process is an opportunity in terms of fundamental democratic reforms, liberal environment, and technical regulatory alignment.
Today, for both the EU and Turkey the enthusiasm to proceed is low. Nevertheless, both parties are still in dialogue for progress even though there are major problems that has to be overcome. There are many issues such as the acceleration of EU enlargement resulting with an enlargement fatigue, the long process Turkey had to deal with; no other country has been kept waiting for accession and membership so long, the blocking efforts of Greece in the past, the acceptance of Cyprus as a member. Additionally, discussions over Turkey’s human rights, liberties and democracy arose skepticism in many European capitals and the mooting of privileged partnership as an alternative for Turkey. It can also be said that there was a change in the EU itself. Enlargement was not seen as a solution anymore, while Islamophobia was fed by terrorist attacks and migration from mainly war-torn Syria.
Turkey's accession negotiations have lost its momentum. This is not just because of Turkey’s reluctance and failure to comply with EU standards. According to Ünal Çeviköz, it has a more fundamental reason behind; Turkey thinks that the EU is not objective and impartial towards Turkey. On the other hand, I must add, it is not just about Turkey either. There is a major change inside the EU. The EU is preparing to embark upon a transformation following Brexit. The European Commission prepared a White Paper with five possible paths for the future of the EU after Brexit, as it suffers from globalization, migration, populism, security concerns, and financial crisis.
The Future
There are several scenarios for the future of Turkey-EU relations. According to Nathalie Tocci from Brookings, there are three possible scenarios: In the first scenario, there will be a growing competition and conflict between Turkey and the EU. The EU will pretend there is accession negotiation with Turkey. But even Turkey’s supporters in the EU will lose faith in the long process. In the second scenario, Turkey and the EU will abandon the accession process and will reach a new framework for cooperation based on respective complementarities. But the EU will lose its leverage on Turkish domestic politics. In the final scenario, the EU will restart the enlargement process towards the East and Turkey will become a full member. In this case, the EU will feature a more integrated core consisting of the Eurozone or inner core such as Germany and France. Turkey will become a member but will not be its most central element.
According to the Dahrendorf Forum’s report, Turkey and the EU relations in 2025 will be characterized by autocratic and geopolitically emboldened Turkey. In the first scenario, they will be able to maintain a functional relationship due to Turkey’s rent-seeking behaviour and EU’s dependence on Turkey in various issues.  In the second scenario, the EU is characterized by a less united, inward looking EU with many domestic problems and less effective regional and global influence. In this case, the EU will lose its economic weight and its normative power as well. Turkey is characterized by political, social and economic instability and its diminished role in the Middle East. This is a catastrophe scenario where Turkey’s accession is not even discussed. In the last scenario, Turkey takes advantage of the refugee deal but the EU lacks leverage and its disunity continues. Refugee deal may be a game changer but the analysis does not give much chance to Turkey’s membership.  
2018 started with a new and fresh spirit on Turkey-EU relations with the meetings between Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris and Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlüt Cavuşoğlu and his German counterpart Sigmar Gabriel in Berlin. There is an effort from EU and Turkish leaders to mend ties. However, there is a gap between what the EU can offer and what Turkey is willing to accept. Cooperation in specific areas instead of full membership is what is pronounced in EU capitals. In that case, UK’s agreement with the EU following Brexit can be a model for Turkey. However, as Ömer Çelik said in his interview with Reuters, Turkey will not even consider an offer of privileged partnership.

Turkey has waited long to be accepted as a member of the Union. Today both entities lack the enthusiasm to continue with the process. Inner dynamics, global security problems are some of the major reasons for this. In the short term, Turkey has a slight possibility of becoming a full EU member. But it will be unfair to say that this is only due to Turkey. This is also the result of the transformation inside the EU. The EU is preparing to the exit of the UK from the Union while facing many problems such as refugee crisis, the rise of nationalism, xenophobia, right wing parties and populist leaders. With such challenges ahead, the EU does not consider the enlargement of the Union as its main strategy. 

Yorumlar

Bu blogdaki popüler yayınlar

Hayır, hayat her şeye rağmen devam etmiyor

6 Eylül 1986.Uzun bir aradan sonra restore edilerek yeniden ibadete açılan Neve Şalom Sinagogu’ndaki bu ilk şabat duasında normale nazaran daha az bir kalabalık vardı. Henüz okullar açılmadığı için, bir çok aile yazlıklarından İstanbul’a dönmemişti. Bu durum, teröristlerin planladığı kadar büyük bir saldırı gerçekleştirmelerine engel oldu ancak dini vecibelerini yerine getirebilmek için sinagogun kapılarından son kez içeri giren 22 kişinin hayatlarını, geride kalan ailelerinin ve bizlerin umutlarını çaldılar. 1940’larda Galata bölgesinde artan nüfusun ihtiyacını karşılamak üzere Musevi lisesinin spor salonunun iptali ile ibadethaneye dönüştürülen geçici mekan, ileriki yıllarda kurulacak Neve Şalom Sinagogunun da temelini oluşturmuştu. 1951 yılında açılan modern sinagog için seçilen ismin kelime anlamı “barış vahası” idi. Ancak bu 65 yıl boyunca isminin aksine birçok terör saldırısının ana hedefi oldu. 1986 saldırısına kadar Türkiye’deki herhangi bir cami veya kilise gibi gezilebilen, k…

Zelenskiy’nin Ukraynası

İdealist, cesur ve yolsuzluklara karşı duran bir öğretmenin tesadüfler sonucu devlet başkanı olmasını konu alan ‘Halkın Hizmetkârı’ dizisinde oynadığı rol hayatını değiştirdi. Küçük bir kasabadan gelen ve kabare grubuyla ülkeyi gezen 1978 doğumlu Vladimir Zelenskiy, önce önemli bir aktör, sonra ülkenin devlet başkanı oldu.  Oynadığı bu rolle halkın sevgisini, daha önemlisi güvenini kazanan Zelenskiy, geçen sene yapılan seçimlerde rakibi eski Devlet Başkanı Petro Poroşenko’yu büyük bir farkla yenerek Ukrayna’nın yeni devlet başkanı seçildi. Oynadığı rol senaryodan sıyrılıp gerçeğe dönüşürken, siyasi bir tecrübesi olmayan bir komedyenin, siyasete uzak yeni bir ismin seçilmiş olması, halkın daha önce yaşadığı hayal kırıklıklarını, müesses nizama olan kızgınlığını ve bıkkınlığını göstermeye yetiyor. Rusya tehdidi ise dil ve kimlik açısından bir hayli bölünmüş olan halkın tek bir isim üzerinde anlaşmasını sağlamış oldu. Siyasi bir geçmişi, tecrübesi bulunmayan Zelenskiy, Ukrayna’ya vaat e…

Koronavirüs Türkiye-İsrail İlişkilerinde Bir Kapı Aralayabilir mi?

Koronavirüs bir çok ilişkiyi yeniden tanımlarken, Türkiye ile İsrail arasındaki ilişkilerin yeniden normalleşmesi için bazı fırsatlar da sunuyor. Ancak bunları değerlendirmek, yeni bir bakış açısıyla ilişkileri ele almak bu iki devletin elinde. İlişkilerdeki güvensizlik ve bunun halklara yansıyan olumsuz etkisi istenirse aşılabilir ama bunun için başta siyasi irade ve dış politikada bir açılım gerekir. Doğal afetlerin ya da pandeminin başlatacağı bir yakınlaşma ancak bu irade olursa sağlanabilir. 
İsrail koronavirüse bir yıldır süren siyasi bir kriz ve Yüzyılın Anlaşması’nın açıklanmasının hemen ardından yakalandı. Pandemiye karşı sert tedbirleri çok hızlı aldı. Zayıf halkası ise modernliği ve seküler yaşam tarzını reddeden Haredimlerdi(ultra-Ortodoks Yahudiler). Türkiye ise koronavirüse karşı biraz daha geç ve bu kadar sert olmayan ama gerekli bir takım tedbirler aldı.  Elinin değdiği her yeri ve her şeyi içine alan ve hayatı durdurma noktasına getiren koronavirüse karşı insanlık büyük…