Ana içeriğe atla

I am cited in Sputnik on Turkish-Israeli relations

Turkey's Main Opposition Party Slams Ankara's Legitimation of Gaza Blockade
Turkey and Israel have reached an agreement on the normalization of relations. Sputnik spoke to Turkish journalists and politicians about the implications of the apparent political rapprochement. 
Israel Sees ‘Immense’ Economic Gains by Making Friends With Turkey Over the weekend, following the announcement by Turkish and Israeli officials that the two countries had reached an agreement on the normalization of relations after six years of mutual estrangement, Israel also made clear that the sea blockade of Gaza would not be lifted; however, Turkey will be able to send supplies to the Palestinian territory through the Israeli port of Ashdod. In turn, Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yildirim stressed that the agreement would allow Turkey to deliver humanitarian aid to Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip. Relations deteriorated following the 2010 Freedom Flotilla incident, when a convoy of six ships, including one sailing under a Turkish flag, tried to approach the Gaza Stripp with humanitarian aid and activists on board. The flotilla was blocked and stormed by Israeli forces, resulting in the deaths of ten Turkish citizens. 
Commenting on the apparent normalization of ties, Karel Valansi, a regular political commentator for Israeli newspapers Haaretz and Shalom, pointed out that Israel has not made any fundamental policy shift to accommodate Ankara on the Gaza issue. The port of Ashdod had been open for humanitarian assistance before, with ground-based delivery of aid carried out through the border point at Kerem Shalom. "From this perspective, the agreement has not resulted in anything new. Was the Gaza blockade lifted? No. A naval blockade continues," the journalist said. "There is information suggesting that a second border post may be opened near Kerem Shalom, facilitating the passage of goods across the border," she added. The purpose of that project, if it materializes, may be "to push Turkey to the forefront of construction work on the Gaza strip."
Netanyahu Thanks Biden for Support During Israel-Turkey Talks "Previously, Turkey had built hospitals and mosques there. Now, the Turkish government intends to expand its activity." Israel too has been forced to make concessions, Valansi noted, specifically with regard to Ankara's refusal to close the Turkey-based offices belonging to Hamas. The journalist suggested that Israel may have "decided not to insist on this condition's implementation on purpose," because "it wants to use Turkey as a mediator between itself and Hamas." Still, given the Israeli government's characterization of Hamas as a terrorist organization, and the presence of several prominent Hamas leaders in Turkey, "from this perspective the agreement clearly has serious flaws." At the same time, given existing geopolitical realities, the commentator suggested that Ankara faced a "much greater need for the restoration of relations than Israel. The time when Israel was presented as the common enemy, the fight against it uniting the entire Muslim and Arab world, has passed. Ultimately, Israel proved more successful than Turkey in the conduct of the policy of 'zero problems with neighbors' [a policy concept outlined by in 2010 by now ex-Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu]. The serious foreign policy mistakes made by Ankara during the events of the Arab Spring and the Syrian crisis led to a deterioration of relations with neighboring countries, and Turkey's isolation in the region. Therefore, Turkey truly very much needed to conclude this agreement [with Israel]," Valansi concluded. 

For their part, lawmakers from Turkey's Republican People's Party, the Main Opposition in the country's National Assembly, slammed the Turkish government's move, telling Sputnik that the Turkish-Israeli agreement effectively amounts to formal recognition of the legitimacy of the blockade of Gaza. 
Israel Planning Gas Deliveries to Europe Through Turkey Utku Cakirozer, a member of the parliamentary planning and budget commission, noted that "judging by the text of the agreement, the blockade of Gaza imposed by Israel is not going to be removed. The Israeli prime minister has said so openly…Given this situation, every Turkish citizen should ask themselves the question: if the blockade is not going to be removed, if we are agreeing to send humanitarian aid to Palestine through the Israeli port of Ashdod, why did we allow defenseless people into the Mediterranean 6 years ago? Why did we give permission for this action? Why did we not provide them with at least basic protection? Who today among the authorities will take responsibility and explain to the Turkish people why it was that ten innocent people were killed in that incident?" Ultimately, the politician emphasized that "for six years, Turks were promised that the blockade of Gaza would be lifted, and that until that time Turkey would maintain its position. After Israel apologized and agreed to pay compensation, the relationship did not improve, since the condition of lifting the blockade was not implemented."  Now, given the move toward rapprochement despite the blockade remaining in place, Cakirozer lamented that the restoration of relations effectively serves as a "formal recognition of the blockade, its legitimacy, on the part of Turkish authorities." Mevlut Dudu, a member of the parliamentary commission on foreign relations, echoed Cakirozer's criticism, adding that the deterioration in Turkish-Israeli relations occurred before the 2010 Gaza flotilla raid, at Davos in 2009, where in a criticism of Israeli leader Shimon Peres, Erdogan demonstratively left the conference hall. Ankara's antagonism, Dudu suggested, has only resulted in geopolitical and economic losses for Turkey.  
Black Sea Buddies: Turkey Looks to Cosy Up to Coastal Neighbors Ultimately, the MP noted, "we are in favor of a normalization of relations with Israel, but there is a very important caveat in this regard: Turkey must put forward a series of conditions for normalization, the most important of which must be the lifting of the blockade against Gaza." However, the government has so far failed to do so. "With this in mind, I believe that the agreement, which does not provide for the removal of the Gaza blockade, does not serve to benefit Turkey or the Middle East as a whole," Dudu concluded.

Sputnik 28 June 2016
http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20160628/1042108930/turkey-israel-rapproachement-implications.html

Yorumlar

Bu blogdaki popüler yayınlar

Ke vamos a mirar en la karantina?

Kon el fin del verano i el retorno de la karantina, estamos mas tiempo en las kazas. Les kero propozar tres serias de TV echos en Israel. El primer es "Tehran". Es una seria de espionaje muy enteresante. Una espion del Mossad viaja en sekreto a la kapital de Iran. Tehran es su lugar de nasimiento tambien. La hacker de komputadora tiene el objektivo de dezaktivar el reaktor nuklear. Esta misyon tendra implikasyones para el Medio Oriente i el mundo entero. La seria es en ebreo i perso. Es una sezon i tiene ocho episodios, kada uno 50 minutos. Mi segunda propozisyon es una seria romantika i komika. Lehiyot Ita (Estar Kon Eya) es una seria de 2013, ma muy simpatika. Izieron tambien la version Amerikana ke se yama “La beyeza i el panadero”. La seria konta la istorya de amor entre una supermodela internasyonal muy famoza i muy rika, i un simple panadero ke no tuvo la shans de ir a la eskola artistika por razones finansiales. La seria es dos sezones, 18 episodios en total i kada uno...

Türkiye-Çin İlişkilerinde Yeni Dönem: Çok Kutupluluk, Ticaret ve Jeostrateji

Küresel düzen ciddi bir değişim yaşarken dünya, çok katmanlı krizler, jeopolitik sarsıntılar ve belirsizliklerle şekillenen bir döneme girdi. Soğuk Savaş sonrası ABD merkezli tek kutuplu düzen geride kalırken, yerine çok kutuplu ancak öngörülemez bir sistem şekilleniyor. Bu belirsizlik, Türkiye–Çin ilişkilerini hem fırsatları hem de çelişkileriyle öne çıkaran bir sahneye dönüştürüyor. Ankara ve Pekin söylem düzeyinde kolayca yan yana gelebiliyor. Türkiye’nin “Dünya beşten büyüktür” çıkışı ile Çin’in “çok kutuplu dünya” vurgusu, Batı merkezli düzeni sorgulayan ortak bir dil yaratıyor. Ancak bu söylemsel yakınlaşma, Türkiye’nin NATO üyeliği ve Batı ile kurumsal bağları düşünüldüğünde, stratejik sınırlarla karşılaşıyor. İlişkilerin gerçek boyutu, ticaretteki asimetri, Kuşak ve Yol yatırımlarındaki bağımlılık riski, savunma sanayii işbirliği, Uygur meselesinin ikili ilişkiler üzerindeki gölgesi ve ABD–Çin rekabetinin baskılarıyla şekilleniyor. Panorama Soruyor  bu ay, Türkiye-Çin ilişk...

The Concept of Middle Power and Türkiye’s Foreign Policy

Ongoing conflicts and crises across various regions continue to underscore the intensifying power rivalries that define today’s international relations. The erosion of the post-1945 international order—and the weakening of the institutions that underpin it—has been further accelerated by the United States’ growing reluctance to maintain its traditional leadership role. As a result, uncertainty has become a defining feature of the current global landscape, marking a turbulent and complex period of transition.  Amid this shifting order, middle powers have begun to occupy a broader space in global affairs. These states, often positioned between global hegemons and smaller, less influential nations, act as stabilizers within the international system. Through mediation efforts, regional diplomacy, and strategic initiatives—sometimes beyond their material capabilities—they contribute meaningfully to international stability and governance. In times of heightened uncertainty, such states o...