Ana içeriğe atla

The uncertainty of the post-Brexit atmosphere

A referendum was held on June 23, 2016 to decide whether the U.K. should leave or remain in the European Union. Approximately 30 million people voted with a turnout of 72.2 percent and the "leave" votes won by a slight majority of 51.9 percent to 48.1 percent. The referendum revealed a divided country. While the north preferred to stay in the EU, the south voted to leave. Older voters went for leave, overriding the young who mostly backed remain. The final result was very close and it also showed how Euro-skepticism affected the country.
This referendum marked the start of a new period of uncertainty for the U.K. and the EU. Nobody was sure about what was coming next. The pound fell following the results and then Prime Minister David Cameron announced he would resign. Since the referendum, the U.K. got a new prime minister, Theresa May. Like Cameron, the former home secretary was against the U.K. leaving the EU during the referendum. She did accept the decision of the British people, however, and triggered the two-year process of leaving the EU. Negotiations started in June 2017, and the U.K. is scheduled to depart from the EU on March 29, 2019.
Uncertainty is the main impact of Brexit. The implementation of Brexit will show what an exit from the EU really means. Until the U.K., no country has ever decided to exit the EU. Only Greenland, one of Denmark's overseas territories with autonomy, held a referendum in 1982, and voted to leave Denmark, and it duly did after a period of negotiations. Exiting the EU was automatic.
Negotiations have started, but still much is uncertain for the U.K. and EU after Brexit. Whether it will be a "hard Brexit" or a "soft Brexit" is the main question. While this decision will outline the future relations between the U.K. and EU, it will also affect the future of the customs union and EU defense strategy.
With the negotiations, the U.K. and EU are trying to find a solution to 43 years of dependence by agreements, treaties and many other common resolutions. These negotiations do not happen only between the U.K. and EU, but also within the EU and with countries worldwide. The relations between countries and institutions may be damaged and there is always the possibility that negotiations could totally collapse. The result is always uncertainty and the unknown.
A domino effect could be a possible impact of Brexit. Brexit challenges the unity, common character and identity of the EU. We do not know what EU members' responses to Brexit and to the agreements achieved via these negotiations will be, especially to the costs involved and to the possible privileges given to the U.K. because it is the U.K. and not any other country.The future of the EU is much based on domestic politics of member states and their views of the EU. It is certain that another member state that would ask for its exit from the EU would not get the same tolerance and privileges that the U.K. might have. Their bonds with the EU, their capacities and capabilities, the availability of other options, their economic, political value for the EU and their strategic value in the world would certainly change their exit terms. As member states know this, they may question the equality of member states. This would negatively affect integration processes and the willingness of candidate countries as they would clearly see that some countries are more equal than the others.
The future of the remaining EU is also of much concern because Brexit added another challenge to the already long list of problems the EU faces. Brexit started a new era of uncertainty in the EU and questions its future. How a country could want to leave such a prestigious and exemplary union is the question that candidate countries and member countries trying to adapt will ask. In a wider sense, Brexit does not just have consequences for the future of the EU but for the future of liberalism, capitalism and the values the EU represents. Brexit also shows the need to rethink globalization.
For the EU, a soft Brexit deal may serve as a model for its future relations with Turkey. As there is no prospect of Turkey joining the EU as a full member in the near future, bilateral relations may ameliorate the situation with a flexible approach. This may initiate alternative forms of close cooperation similar to the one the EU is trying to achieve with the U.K., which will soon no longer be an EU member state.
Brexit is an open-ended process and we do not yet know what the consequences will be. But the one thing that is for sure is that even after Brexit, ties between the EU and the U.K. will not be totally cut off, as both parties benefit from them. Even through the U.K. will not be part of the EU after April 2019, it will most probably continue to have security, border and economic agreements and cooperation similar to the current situation. Due to the importance of the U.K., even when it is out of the bloc, it will have such close relations with the EU that relations will be like preferential treatment. Relations will be so close that one might think that the exit decision was just a bad dream when they wake up with a headache the next morning.

Yorumlar

Bu blogdaki popüler yayınlar

Ke vamos a mirar en la karantina?

Kon el fin del verano i el retorno de la karantina, estamos mas tiempo en las kazas. Les kero propozar tres serias de TV echos en Israel. El primer es "Tehran". Es una seria de espionaje muy enteresante. Una espion del Mossad viaja en sekreto a la kapital de Iran. Tehran es su lugar de nasimiento tambien. La hacker de komputadora tiene el objektivo de dezaktivar el reaktor nuklear. Esta misyon tendra implikasyones para el Medio Oriente i el mundo entero. La seria es en ebreo i perso. Es una sezon i tiene ocho episodios, kada uno 50 minutos. Mi segunda propozisyon es una seria romantika i komika. Lehiyot Ita (Estar Kon Eya) es una seria de 2013, ma muy simpatika. Izieron tambien la version Amerikana ke se yama “La beyeza i el panadero”. La seria konta la istorya de amor entre una supermodela internasyonal muy famoza i muy rika, i un simple panadero ke no tuvo la shans de ir a la eskola artistika por razones finansiales. La seria es dos sezones, 18 episodios en total i kada uno...

Orta Büyüklükte Bir Güç Olarak Türkiye’nin Dış Politikası

Farklı bölgelerde devam eden savaş ve krizler, uluslararası ilişkilerde güç rekabetini öne çıkarıyor. Buna ABD’nin büyük güç olarak alışılmış rolünü yerine getirmekteki isteksizliği de eklendiğinde, 1945’ten bu yana kurulan uluslararası düzen ve yapı taşı olan kurumlar yıpranıyor. Bunun sonucu olarak belirsizlik artıyor ve mevcut küresel sistem bir geçiş döneminin sancılarını yaşıyor. Öte yandan bu durum, orta güç olarak tanımlanan ülkelere daha geniş bir hareket alanı da sağlıyor. Bu sayede orta güçteki ülkeler, sistemde dengeyi gözeten, arabuluculuk yapabilen, bölgesinin istikrarına katkı sağlayabilen, hatta zaman zaman kapasitesinin üzerinde sorumluluk ve inisiyatif alabilen, küresel düzeyde etkili roller oynayabilen aktörler haline geliyor. Özellikle belirsizlik dönemlerinde bu ülkeler çok yönlü diplomasi, proaktif dış politika, esnek ittifak arayışları ile öne çıkabiliyor. Türkiye, bu bağlamda, orta güçte bir devlet olarak dikkat çeken bir örnek teşkil ediyor. Jeostratejik konumu,...

The Concept of Middle Power and Türkiye’s Foreign Policy

Ongoing conflicts and crises across various regions continue to underscore the intensifying power rivalries that define today’s international relations. The erosion of the post-1945 international order—and the weakening of the institutions that underpin it—has been further accelerated by the United States’ growing reluctance to maintain its traditional leadership role. As a result, uncertainty has become a defining feature of the current global landscape, marking a turbulent and complex period of transition.  Amid this shifting order, middle powers have begun to occupy a broader space in global affairs. These states, often positioned between global hegemons and smaller, less influential nations, act as stabilizers within the international system. Through mediation efforts, regional diplomacy, and strategic initiatives—sometimes beyond their material capabilities—they contribute meaningfully to international stability and governance. In times of heightened uncertainty, such states o...